Future? No Thanks!, an open-world game created by Pedercini, is being treated by Steam as an adult-only title despite the developer saying its sexual content is limited and non-explicit. Valve rejected the game again after changes were made, but Pedercini says the company still would not explain exactly what needed to be removed.
The game follows an old man who has been scheduled for euthanasia as he moves through an “ecosocialist eutopia.” Its mature themes include sex, gender, death, legalized prostitution, euthanasia, drug and tobacco references, sexual innuendo, and mild swearing.
Valve rejected the submission again
According to Aftermath’s report, Pedercini said the game contains brief nudity and mature material, but no intercourse appears on screen. The developer was willing to make changes to meet Steam’s requirements, especially since an adult-only rating could severely limit the game’s visibility.
Pedercini says the first round of changes included dressing the sex worker and the sexbot to remove the game’s nudity. Even after that adjustment, Valve rejected the submission on the grounds that it contained sexual content that was explicit or graphic and intended only for adults.
The frustrating part is that Pedercini says Valve told him it could not specify the reasons for the decision or point to the content that caused the problem. Without that information, changing the game becomes a guessing exercise. The developer can either keep altering material without knowing whether the next submission will pass or accept a rating that may prevent many players from finding the game.
“Steam is a monopoly with very few precedents,” Pedercini told Aftermath. “As a developer, I’m completely at their whim.”
Steam’s influence extends beyond a single rating
Whether Steam legally qualifies as a monopoly remains disputed, but its position as a central PC storefront gives Valve’s decisions considerable weight. A developer can technically publish elsewhere, yet losing visibility on Steam can still make it much harder for a game to reach its audience.
That is why the dispute goes beyond the adult-only label itself. Pedercini is not arguing that mature content should avoid review; he is asking for a clear explanation of what violates the store’s rules so the game can be adjusted with a specific target in mind. For now, Future? No Thanks! remains caught between content changes that have already been made and a decision the developer says he cannot properly address.
What do you think about Valve’s handling of the rating dispute? Share your thoughts in the comments, and follow us on X, Bluesky, YouTube, Instagram, Steam, Telegram.
