EA and DICE faced sharp criticism after users on X highlighted apparent use of photographs from the Gaza conflict in promotional artwork for Battlefield 2025. The posts triggered a wider debate about when imagery tied to real-world suffering should be used in video game marketing.
The thread began when EmadAlden pointed out similarities between the game art and real photos. Another X account, DANNYonPC, went further and alleged the images matched photos from bombings in Gaza dated May 12, 2021. DANNYonPC’s post included the line, “Damn, DICE is using pictures from attacks on Gaza in their BF2025 artwork.”
Reaction was immediate and vocal. Many commenters called the choice distressing and questioned the editorial and vetting processes behind promotional assets. Others suggested the matches could be coincidental or the result of third-party art sourcing. EA and DICE had not issued an official statement about the claims at the time this was published.
This controversy underscored broader ethical questions for the industry. Should developers and publishers draw on real conflict photography for fictional marketing? If those images were used without clear context or permission, critics argued it risked trivializing trauma and ignored the people who experienced those events.
Similar public backlashes have hit other publishers in recent years. For context on how quickly community reaction can escalate around company decisions, see our coverage of another high-profile publisher under fire: Activision faces backlash as Black Ops 6 anti-cheat struggles to keep up.
Follow us on X, Bluesky, YouTube, Instagram and share your thoughts in the comments. Tell us what you think about using real-world conflict imagery in game promotion.
